Plano Premises Liability Lawyer

SERIOUS ATTORNEYS FOR SERIOUS INJURIES

If you were hurt on someone else’s property in the Plano area, Texas law may give you the right to hold that property owner responsible. Premises liability is the area of law that covers injuries caused by unsafe conditions on someone else’s land, building, or business. Whether you slipped in a retail store off the Dallas North Tollway, were hurt at an apartment complex near Legacy Town Center, or tripped on a broken sidewalk outside a shopping center on Preston Road, the property owner may owe you compensation. At Chandler Ross Injury Attorneys, we represent injured people throughout Denton County and the greater Dallas-Fort Worth area, including Plano. If you have questions about your rights, call us at (940) 800-2500.

Table of Contents

How Texas Premises Liability Law Defines a Property Owner’s Duty to You

Texas law does not give every injured visitor the same legal protections. The duty a property owner owes you depends entirely on why you were on the property when you got hurt. Texas premises liability law divides visitors into three categories: invitees, licensees, and trespassers. Each category carries a different legal standard.

Invitees earn the highest level of duty of care. They are on the property for a purpose that benefits the property owner, and owners must not only avoid creating hazards but also regularly inspect the premises and address any potential risks. Think of a customer shopping at a Plano grocery store on Park Boulevard. That customer is an invitee. If the store’s floor is wet and no one placed a warning sign, the store owner may be liable.

Licensees enter the property with the owner’s consent but not for the owner’s benefit. Owners owe these visitors a warning of any hidden dangers they are aware of, but they are not required to inspect the premises for any potential hazards. A social guest at a private home is a common example of a licensee.

Trespassers enter another’s property without lawful authority or permission. The only duty owed to a trespasser is the duty not to cause injury willfully, wantonly, or through gross negligence. There is one important exception: the attractive nuisance doctrine. Property owners may be liable for injuries to children who trespass on land if the injury results from a hazardous object or condition on the land, such as a swimming pool, construction equipment, or gravel pit, that is likely to attract children who are unable to appreciate the risks posed by the object or condition.

Understanding which category applies to your situation is one of the first steps in building a premises liability claim. The personal injury lawyers at Chandler Ross Injury Attorneys can review the specific facts of your case and tell you where you stand under Texas law.

The Four Elements You Must Prove in a Texas Premises Liability Case

Winning a premises liability claim in Texas requires proof of four specific elements. Missing any one of them can defeat an otherwise valid case. Knowing what these elements are helps you understand what evidence matters most after an injury.

Premises liability is a special type of negligence claim, so the elements of negligence, including duty, breach, proximate cause, and injury, must all be satisfied. Here is what each one means in practical terms.

First, you must show the property owner owed you a duty of care. That duty depends on your visitor status, as explained above. Second, you must show the owner breached that duty. A breach occurs when a property owner fails to uphold their duty of care. For example, if a property owner either knew or should have known about a dangerous condition on their property and failed to address it in a reasonable amount of time, they have breached their duty of care.

Third, you must connect that breach to your injury. The dangerous condition must be the direct cause of what happened to you. Fourth, you must show actual damages, such as medical bills, lost wages, or pain and suffering. A scare or a near-miss does not give rise to a claim under Texas law.

Notice is often the most contested part of any case. Actual knowledge means the owner or someone working for them knew about the hazard before the fall. For example, if a customer told an employee there was a spill in Aisle 5, and the store did nothing about it, that may be enough to prove actual knowledge. Constructive knowledge exists when the hazard was present long enough that the owner should have discovered it through proper inspections. Both types of knowledge can support a premises liability claim.

Gathering evidence quickly after an injury is critical. Surveillance footage, incident reports, witness statements, and maintenance logs can all help establish what the property owner knew and when they knew it. Chandler Ross Injury Attorneys knows how to preserve this evidence before it disappears.

Common Premises Liability Hazards in the Plano Area

Premises liability claims arise from a wide range of dangerous conditions. Plano is a busy city with heavy commercial activity along corridors like the Dallas North Tollway, US-75 (Central Expressway), and Legacy Drive. That activity creates real risks for shoppers, diners, workers, and residents every day.

Slip and fall incidents are among the most common claims. Wet floors in grocery stores and restaurants, poorly lit parking lots, and uneven pavement all create fall hazards. A puddle caused by melting ice beside an ice machine could be a problem, particularly if it is not promptly addressed. Likewise, puddles caused by improper drainage could incur liability, particularly if they are allowed to remain for a long time and grow slippery algae.

Inadequate security is another major category. Apartment complexes, parking garages, and entertainment venues near the Shops at Legacy or around Haggard Park have an obligation to protect guests from foreseeable criminal acts when the risk is known. Claims involving negligent security connect directly to the broader idea that a property owner’s duty extends beyond physical hazards to the safety of the environment they control.

Construction site hazards also generate serious premises liability claims. Under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 95, a property owner is not liable for injuries to contractors or their employees unless the owner exercised control over the manner in which the work was performed and had actual knowledge of the danger. This statute matters greatly if you were hurt while working on an improvement to real property in Plano.

Other common hazards include broken staircases, falling merchandise, exposed electrical wiring, swimming pool accidents, and dog bites on private property. Each type of claim has its own evidentiary demands. Serious injuries, including traumatic brain injuries and catastrophic injuries, can result from any of these conditions, making it vital to act quickly and contact an attorney.

Texas Law Defenses Property Owners Use and How to Counter Them

Property owners and their insurance companies rarely accept liability without a fight. They use several legal defenses to reduce or eliminate what they owe you. Knowing these defenses in advance helps you understand why building a strong case from day one matters so much.

The most common defense is comparative fault. Under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 33.001, Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule. If a jury finds you more than 50 percent responsible for your own injury, you recover nothing. If you are found partially at fault but below that threshold, your damages are reduced by your percentage of fault. A property owner’s lawyer might argue you were not paying attention, wore inappropriate footwear, or ignored a visible warning sign.

Another defense involves the “open and obvious” doctrine. Property owners sometimes argue they owed no duty to warn because the danger was so visible that any reasonable person would have noticed and avoided it. However, Texas law recognizes exceptions to this argument. The invitee’s appreciation of the danger remains relevant to the landowner’s proportionate-responsibility defenses, but it does not relieve the landowner of its duty to take reasonable steps to make the premises safe.

Texas’s Recreational Use Statute, found in Chapter 75 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code, is another defense property owners raise. If an owner, lessee, or occupant of real property other than agricultural land gives permission to another to enter the premises for recreation, the owner does not assure that the premises are safe for that purpose, and does not owe the person a greater degree of care than is owed to a trespasser. However, this protection does not limit the liability of an owner, lessee, or occupant of real property who has been grossly negligent or has acted with malicious intent or in bad faith.

Countering these defenses requires evidence, legal knowledge, and a clear understanding of how Texas courts apply these rules. The team at Chandler Ross Injury Attorneys, located at 110 N. Woodrow Ln, Ste 120, Denton, TX 76205, is ready to build that case for you.

The Deadline to File a Premises Liability Lawsuit in Texas

Texas law sets a strict deadline for filing a premises liability lawsuit. Missing this deadline almost always means losing your right to recover any compensation, no matter how strong your case is. You must act before time runs out.

Under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 16.003, the standard statute of limitations for personal injury claims, including premises liability, is two years from the date of the injury. If you were hurt at a Plano retail center, apartment complex, or business in 2026, you generally have two years from that date to file suit in a Texas court, such as the Collin County District Court in McKinney.

There are limited exceptions. If the injured person is a minor, the clock may not start running until they turn 18. If the property owner is a government entity, such as the City of Plano or a state agency, different rules apply. Under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 101.022, claims against governmental units for premise defects are subject to the Texas Tort Claims Act, which limits the duty owed and requires notice to be given to the government within six months of the incident in many cases. This is a shorter window than the standard two-year period, and it applies whether your injury happened near Bob Woodruff Park, a Plano city facility, or a public road.

Two years can feel like a long time, but premises liability cases take time to investigate properly. Surveillance footage gets deleted. Witnesses move away. Property conditions get repaired. Waiting too long to contact a lawyer puts your case at serious risk. Call Chandler Ross Injury Attorneys at (940) 800-2500 as soon as possible after your injury.

What Compensation You Can Recover in a Plano Premises Liability Case

Texas law allows injured victims to pursue two broad categories of damages in a premises liability case: economic damages and non-economic damages. In cases involving intentional or grossly negligent conduct, exemplary (punitive) damages may also be available.

Economic damages cover your measurable financial losses. These include past and future medical expenses, rehabilitation costs, lost wages, and lost earning capacity. If your injury required surgery, physical therapy, or ongoing medical care, every one of those costs can be included in your claim. If you missed weeks or months of work, that lost income is recoverable too.

Non-economic damages compensate you for losses that do not come with a price tag. Pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, and disfigurement all fall into this category. These damages are often the largest component of a serious injury claim, especially when the injury causes lasting limitations.

Premises liability cases can involve serious harm. Slip and fall accidents cause broken bones, spinal injuries, and head trauma. Falls from heights at construction sites cause catastrophic injuries. Inadequate security situations can lead to violent assaults with life-changing consequences. In cases involving wrongful death, surviving family members may be entitled to bring a separate claim for their own losses.

Every case is different, and past results in other cases do not guarantee any particular outcome in yours. What matters is the specific facts, the strength of your evidence, and the skill of your legal representation. The attorneys at Chandler Ross Injury Attorneys handle premises liability cases on a contingency fee basis, which means you pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. Call (940) 800-2500 to discuss your case.

FAQs About Plano Premises Liability Claims

What is premises liability, and how is it different from a general negligence claim?

Premises liability is a specific type of negligence claim that applies when someone is injured due to an unsafe condition on another person’s property. The key difference is that the duty of care owed to the injured person depends on their legal status as an invitee, licensee, or trespasser at the time of the injury. A general negligence claim does not use this visitor-classification framework. Both types of claims still require proof of duty, breach, causation, and damages under Texas law.

Can I still recover compensation if I was partially at fault for my injury?

Yes, in many cases. Texas follows a modified comparative fault rule under Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 33.001. As long as a jury finds you 50 percent or less responsible for your injury, you can still recover damages. However, your total compensation is reduced by your percentage of fault. If you are found 51 percent or more at fault, you recover nothing. This is why it is important to have an attorney who can present evidence clearly and counter arguments that you were careless.

How long do I have to file a premises liability lawsuit in Plano, Texas?

In most cases, you have two years from the date of your injury to file a premises liability lawsuit in Texas under Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 16.003. If the property is owned by a government entity, such as the City of Plano, shorter notice deadlines may apply under the Texas Tort Claims Act. If the injured person is a minor, the deadline may be extended. Because exceptions exist and evidence can disappear quickly, contacting an attorney as soon as possible after your injury is strongly recommended.

What if the property owner says the hazard was obvious and I should have seen it?

This is a common defense, but it does not automatically end your case. Texas courts recognize that even when a danger is visible, a property owner may still have a duty to address it, particularly when the injured person had no reasonable way to avoid the hazard. For example, if the only path into a building required walking through a known dangerous area, the owner’s duty to fix or warn about that condition does not disappear simply because the danger was visible. An attorney can analyze whether this defense applies to your specific situation.

Does Texas law protect property owners who allow people onto their land for recreational use?

Yes, to a degree. Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 75, known as the Recreational Use Statute, limits the duty of care owed to people who enter property for recreational purposes without paying a fee. In those situations, the owner generally owes no greater duty than is owed to a trespasser. However, this protection does not apply when the owner acted with gross negligence, malicious intent, or in bad faith. If you were seriously hurt on recreational property in or near Plano, an attorney can determine whether this statute applies to your situation and whether any exceptions protect your right to recover.

More Resources About Premises Liability

EXCELLENT
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5
Based on 127 reviews
Posted on Google Google
Chasey Malone profile picture
Chasey Malone
2 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Erin was amazing. I had no idea what I was doing and they made the entire process simple and stress free. I cannot thank them enough for what they’ve done for me
Posted on Google Google
Kristin Porter profile picture
Kristin Porter
4 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
After my car accident, we called Chandler Ross and from the very first phone call we knew we had called the right people. They were sensitive, caring, and truly helped guide us in all of our decisions. We couldn't have asked for a better experience, and we were very happy with the outcome of our case. My husband and I would recommend Chandler Ross to anyone experiencing an injury due to a car accident. They were wonderful!
Posted on Google Google
Payton DePalma profile picture
Payton DePalma
10 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Erin was an awesome case manager! Made the best of a tough series of events.
Posted on Google Google
Brittany & Chris Beeson profile picture
Brittany & Chris Beeson
13 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Professional and easy to work with! Thankful for all of their help and advice!
Posted on Google Google
Terrence Oflaherty profile picture
Terrence Oflaherty
30 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I was in a car accident July 2025 and had a neck injury that required me to take time off of work. I reached out to Chandler & Ross three days after the accident and after reviewing all the info they took my case. They handled everything for me and got the PT appointments that my body needed to get to speed. On top of that, my settlement was alot more than I was expecting. They are an extremely professional law firm. I’m glad I let them take my injury case.
Posted on Google Google
Sarah Walters profile picture
Sarah Walters
44 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Absolute best personal injury attorney I have ever had! They made my experience such a breeze! Arecka is the best! She’s friendly and kind and quick to respond! Will definitely be using them in the future!!
Posted on Google Google
journie david profile picture
journie david
51 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I honestly can’t thank this office enough for everything they did for me. From the start, everyone was super nice, supportive, and always willing to answer my questions. My lawyer (Arecka) was really professional, knew what she was doing, and actually cared about helping me through a tough time. She kept me updated the whole way and made everything way less stressful. I always felt like I was in good hands. I’d definitely recommend this office to anyone looking for a team that really cares about their clients and works hard to get the best possible outcome.
Posted on Google Google
Paola Pecina profile picture
Paola Pecina
64 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Arecka works hard for you. It’s a drawn out hard process but they are there for you along the way.
Posted on Google Google
Abby Loera profile picture
Abby Loera
81 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Working with Brent, Tony, and Jennifer was a pleasure. They were prompt, kind, and kept me updated at every stage of the procedure. My issue was handled expertly by Brent and Tony, who also took the time to respond to my inquiries. Jennifer was really helpful and ensured that everything went without a hitch. I sincerely value their diligence and commitment. I heartily suggest them if you're searching for a legal firm that provides excellent service and genuinely cares about its clients. I appreciate all of your assistance.
Posted on Google Google
Jorge Loera profile picture
Jorge Loera
81 days ago
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Choosing this law firm was one of the best decisions I could have made. From day one, the entire team made me feel supported, informed, and confident that my case was in good hands. Going through a legal case can be stressful and overwhelming, but they made the entire process as easy and smooth as possible. Their communication was excellent, and they kept me updated every step of the way. Whenever I had questions or concerns, they responded quickly and took the time to explain everything clearly. The attorneys and staff worked incredibly hard on my case and demonstrated professionalism, dedication, and genuine care throughout the entire process. They paid attention to every detail, fought for my best interests, and never made me feel like I was just another client. What stood out most was their honesty, compassion, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome. They handled the difficult aspects of the case so I could focus on moving forward, and they always made me feel like a priority. I am extremely grateful for all of their hard work, persistence, and support. The entire team exceeded my expectations, and I highly recommend this law firm to anyone looking for experienced attorneys who truly care about their clients and work tirelessly to deliver outstanding results.